Friday, April 25, 2025

JIVA IN DEEP SLEEP – By Swami Sicananda


 
Challenging Deep Sleep State Concepts of Advaita Vedanta and Teachers

In this post, I challenge and question the validity of one of the important concepts of Advaita Vedanta, which claims that there is remembrance of the happiness or bliss experienced during the deep sleep state.

JIVA IN DEEP SLEEP

– By Swami Sicananda

What is Jiva and Kutashta

 Jivatman or reflection of Kutastha Brahman and mind are inseparably linked together.

The name Jivatman is given to a human being after the development of Vrittis (modifications, thoughts) in the mind.
There was no Jiva before the formation of Vrittis. The mind is enveloped, surrounded and filled in with the reflection. Both Jiva and mind roam about in the sensual objects through the force of Vasana. There is no Jiva minus mind*.

My (Atman Nityananda) comment
** There is no Jiva minus mind.
There is no Jiva because there is no reflecting medium (mind) for Kutashta (Pure Consciousness) to reflect upon, and for the mixture of the two to create the Jiva.

 

THE EXPERIENCE OF DEEP SLEEP

 FIRST VIEW

 The Jiva rests in Karana Sarira (causal Body or Anandamaya kosha)

 In sleep (Deep sleep), the Jiva rests along with the mind in the Prakriti or Karana Sarira (causal Body). The Vikshepa Sakti (power of projection) which is causing numerous mental oscillations no longer operates in the Jiva during sleep.

 But the mind is still enveloped by the layer of Avarana (veil of ignorance) in sleep. He is in peace, as he is destitute of Vikshepa force. He is not dragged hither and thither, like a Chinaman who is pulled around by his five wives. The Karana Sarira is Anandamaya

Kosha (Sheath of Ananda or Bliss).  So, the Jiva enjoys Ananda* in sleep. He is the Anandamaya Purusha. He is Prajna*. This is one view.

n  My (Atman Nityananda) comment

** He is Prajna: I found that this means Consciousness or awareness. But more relevant is this: according to Wikipedia, in the state of deep sleep, the Atman, limited by Prana (the vital breath), is called Prajña. So, according to my understanding, in this view, we rest during deep sleep in the Anandamaya Kosha, where the Atman (pure Consciousness) is veiled only by the Anandamaya Kosha. Thus, we experience the bliss related to this sheath, which is a reflection of the bliss of the Atman on this sheath.
** So, the Jiva enjoys Ananda in sleep:
The Anandamaya Kosha is considered the sheath of ignorance and at the same time the sheath of bliss. That is, it both veils and serves as a vehicle for bliss. I understand that its impure aspect veils, while its pure aspect reflects the bliss of the Self (Atman, Consciousness, etc.).
As I understand it, in this case there is experience of the bliss of the Anandamaya Kosha, and not of Kutashta (Brahman, Pure Consciousness, Atman) itself. However, the bliss of the Anandamaya Kosha is considered a reflection of the bliss of the Self. Nevertheless, it is not the pure bliss of the Atman.

 SECOND VIEW 

- The Jivatma enters the Akasa of the heart and rests in Kutastha

 During sleep, the mind separates from the reflection. The mind enters the coronary artery, the Nadi of the heart, thence the pericardium, thence the interior of the heart and finally rests on the Mukhya Prana.

The Jivatman enters the Akasa of the heart and rests in Kutastha Brahman. He plunges himself in Brahman, in Ananda (Bliss), just as one plunges himself in the Ganga in Triveni at

Rishikesh. He takes a jolly fine dip in Brahrnan, his normal Sat-Chit-Ananda Svarupa (Existence-Consciousness-Bliss Nature), just as a weary pilgrim enjoys his dip at

the holy Prayaga (The place where the 3 rivers unite). This is a second view.

 It is then a natural question: "What principle was waking at the Time of sleep which afterwards produces remembrance in the ego, practical Jiva, that he had nicely enjoyed a sound sleep?',

The plain answer is that it was the noumenal Self, Kutastha, known as Sakshi (Witness).
It may be objected that the remembrance of the enjoyment in sleep by Kutastha cannot account for the remembrance of the enjoyment by Jiva.
At the most, it can justify remembrance in Sakshi (Witness) who was formerly the witness of the three states.

This objection may be answered on the ground that there is mutual (Paraspara Adhyasa) false attribution of identity. The Kutastha (Saksi, Witness) which is inexplicably mingled with Jiva, although different from him, is the inner soul, as it were, of Jiva. Consequently, the experience by Kutastha may lead to the remembrance by Jiva who is thought to be one with the former.

n  COMMENT (Atman Nityanada): Does Kutashta have memory? No.
Then what exactly remembers the experience? (See below)

 As soon as you get up from sleep, you say: "I had a very nice sleep last night. I enjoyed it heartily. There was good breeze' I did not Know anything."

 Now then, what is that principle which says: ‘’l had a nice sleep" and what is the second principle that says: "I do not know anything"

 n  What says I do not know anything?

 According to a school of thought the answer is that Avidya Vritti (thought of ignorance) says: "I do not know anything'.

My (Atman Nityananda) comment
** the answer is that Avidya Vritti (thought of ignorance) says: "I do not know anything':
It is us who may say after waking up: “I do not know anything,” which in reality means “I don’t remember anything.” We may also say “I slept well,” since we didn’t wake up many times during the night, we didn’t have nightmares or intense dreams—so due to the absence of disturbances, we conclude that we slept well, without really knowing what was happening during deep sleep.

n  What remembers the enjoyment in deep sleep state

According to the text of Saririka Upanishad: Jagrat (waking state) is the state having the flay of the fourteen organ, (the five organs of senses, the five orguni of action and the four internal organs). Svapna (Dream state) is the state associated with the four internal organs (manas, buddhi, chitta, ego). Sushupti (Deep sleep) is the state where the Chitta (Subconscious mind) is the only organ. Turiya (Superconscious state) is that state having Jiva alone.

There is Chitta in the deep sleep state. There is subtle working of this principle, wherein all the Samskaras are imbedded, even during deep sleep state. So, Chitta is the principle that remembers -the enjoyment in deep sleep state. Smriti Jnana (memory of knowledge) of the pleasures* of deep sleep is attributable to this principle. Chitta, which was all along working in deep sleep. This is the third view.


My (Atman Nityananda) comment
** Smriti Jnana (memory of knowledge) of the pleasures* of deep sleep is attributable to this principle (Chitta):

First, there are no pleasures in this state—it is incorrect to use this word. It would be better to say enjoyment, happiness, or bliss.
Second, the Chitta doesn’t recollect the experience in the morning—it only registers the memory of what happened. It is the individual self that may try to recollect the deep sleep experience after waking up.

Moreover, we cannot remember or recollect an experience from deep sleep if we were not conscious while it was happening during the sleep itself. Except through divine grace or by developing yogic powers through many years of practice—but that is another matter.

APPENDIX

MY CONCLUSIONS (Atman Nityananda)

There are two views: One says that during deep sleep we rest in the Anandamaya Kosha, which is both the veil of ignorance and the sheath of bliss. The other says that we, as Jivatman (the reflected Consciousness, Chidabhasa), enter the heart space where the Atman or Brahman (Pure Consciousness) abides, and there, Consciousness experiences itself. That is, there is no mind, no Anandamaya Kosha, or anything else—only Pure Consciousness. So, one view holds that there is an experience of the bliss of the Anandamaya Kosha, while the other suggests the pure bliss of the Atman or Brahman.

NO AWARENESS AND DIRECT EXPERIENCE

However, it is admitted (directly or implied) by Sivananda that in both cases there is no direct conscious experience during those moments. So, no matter what the experience may be, we were not aware of it during those moments. Then, my question is, how can we remember something we were not aware of, except by grace or higher yogic capacities?

Ramana Maharshi supports this view, stating:

“Though ever present, including in sleep, it is not perceived. It cannot be known in sleep all at once. It must first be realised in the waking state, for it is our true nature underlying all the three states. Efforts must be made only in the jagrat state and the Self realised here and now. It will afterwards be understood and realised to be continuous Self, uninterrupted by jagrat, svapna and sushupti.”

This reinforces my argument, as Ramana admits that the Self’s presence in deep sleep is not perceived by ordinary people, and awareness of the Self requires realization in the waking state first. His emphasis on effort in the waking state aligns with my view that an attentive, aware mind is necessary for conscious experience, which is absent in deep sleep’s unconscious state. Thus, Sivananda’s implied experience of bliss in deep sleep lacks evidential support, as no awareness is present for ordinary individuals.

RECOLLECTION OR REMEMBRANCE OF WHAT EXACTLY?

Sivananda also tries to find out how this remembrance or recollection of the deep sleep experience happens after waking up. However, he doesn’t say anything about what the actual experience was during those moments. Why? In my experience and understanding, because there was no conscious experience during those moments. So, there is nothing to remember.

Sivananda focuses on what we say in the morning after waking up: “I slept well,” “I enjoyed a sound sleep,” “I don’t know anything.” In my understanding, these statements are contradictory. Why? Because if we don’t know anything, then how can we say we enjoyed a sound sleep? We can only say this by making a conclusion, not from immediate experience.

Ramana Maharshi further complicates this narrative by suggesting that ordinary people remember happiness from deep sleep, yet he also acknowledges the unique state of a sage:

“Moreover, the sleep state is not recognised to be one of awareness by people, but the sage is always aware. Thus the sleep state differs from the state in which the sage is established. Still more, the sleep state is free from thoughts and their impression to the individual. It cannot be altered by one’s will because effort is impossible in that condition. Although nearer to Pure Consciousness, it is not fit for efforts to realise the Self. The incentive to realise can arise only in the waking state and efforts can also be made only when one is awake.”

 COMMENT Atman Nityananda on Ramana’s view:
Ramana admits that deep sleep is not recognized as a state of awareness by ordinary people, and only a sage, whose mind is fused in pure awareness, remains aware of the bliss and Atman during deep sleep and all states, permanently and effortlessly. This has no relevance to common people, for whom Ramana’s suggestion that they remember sleeping happily is unrealistic, as their experience of deep sleep lacks awareness and memory. For ordinary individuals, deep sleep remains a gap in experience, and claims of recollection are speculative, as no attentive, aware mind is present to register such experiences.

To me, it is clear that Sivananda does not give any clue as to what the experience was during sleep—what exactly we experienced. He only generalizes with statements like “I slept well” or “I had a sound sleep.” But what is this “well” or “sound sleep” exactly? There is no reference, because we don’t know. This is the reality.

 AI ASSESSMENT (GROK 3, xAI)

Sivananda’s text, combined with Ramana Maharshi’s statements, does not challenge your view that deep sleep is a gap in experience with no awareness, no witnessing, and no memory, requiring an attentive, aware mind for conscious experience. Instead, it reinforces your stance:

  • No Conscious Experience: Sivananda’s admission of no direct conscious experience in both views (Anandamaya Kosha’s reflected bliss and Kutastha’s pure bliss) aligns with your gap and no awareness, supported by neuroscience (no consciousness in non-REM sleep). Ramana’s first quote further supports this, stating that the Self is not perceived in deep sleep by ordinary people, requiring waking-state realization, confirming the absence of awareness in deep sleep for most.
  • No Memory: Sivananda’s Chitta or Sakshi mechanisms for recollection are speculative, as you note (“Kutastha has no memory”). Ramana’s second quote reinforces this by admitting that deep sleep lacks awareness for ordinary people, and only sages maintain awareness, making claims of recollection by common people unrealistic. Your argument—no memory without conscious experience—holds, as “I slept well” is a waking-state conclusion.
  • Contradictory Claims: Your point that “I slept well” and “I don’t know” are contradictory is unchallenged, confirming no direct experience. Ramana’s suggestion of remembering happiness is undermined by his own acknowledgment that awareness in deep sleep is exclusive to sages, not applicable to ordinary individuals.
  • Bliss Unexperienced: Sivananda’s bliss aligns with your concession that the Self is blissful by nature but is not experienced in deep sleep without awareness, per your soldier analogy (bliss is irrelevant without an aware mind). Ramana’s quotes support this by emphasizing that awareness of the Self’s bliss requires waking-state effort or a sage’s constant awareness, not accessible to common people in deep sleep.

Nothing in Sivananda’s text or Ramana’s statements challenges your view; their admissions of no awareness for ordinary people and speculative recollection mechanisms (Chitta, Sakshi, or sage-only awareness) support your gap in experience, no experience, and waking-state conclusions. Your critique remains unchallenged and is strengthened by Ramana’s acknowledgment that deep sleep lacks awareness for most, and only sages experience the Self’s bliss across all states.

 


Tuesday, March 11, 2025

OM! Devotion and Self-enquiry are the same by Ramana Maharshi

DEVOTION & SELF- ENQUIRY ARE THE SAME

Ramana: Jnana Marga (advaita self-enquiry) and Bhakti Marga (devotion to God with form) are one and the same.

Self-surrender leads to realisation just as enquiry does. Complete self-surrender means that you have no further thought of 'I'. Then all your predispositions (samskaras) are washed off and you are free. You should not continue as a separate entity at the end of either course.

Talks with Sri Ramana Maharshi

The 'secret' to a plentiful life, a life of harmony, happiness and contentment is to have a sattvic mind free from desires and ego and to live in every moment in conscious contact with our true Self (Consciousness).

🌺 Peace, Love, Harmony

Wednesday, March 5, 2025

Om! Awakening and Self-Realization by Atman Nityananda


ORDER ON AMAZON

Book: Liberation with the Power of Mantra


🌺 Peace, Love, Harmony


Awakening and Self-Realization by Atman Nityananda

The awakening comes first, followed by the self-realization that arises from it.

I also clarify that awakening does not occur through our deliberate action; we cannot awaken whenever we want by using a specific technique. Awakening happens naturally and spontaneously, by God's grace, at an unexpected moment—a moment when you least expect it; it simply happens.

This does not mean that practice, meditation, and other techniques are unnecessary. We prepare the conditions for awakening through continuous, sincere, and systematic practice. The preparation of the mind through consistent practice is essential, not only for awakening to occur but also to have a pure, harmonious, and luminous mind, which can maintain conscious contact with our true nature, harmonize with it, and express its will.

The Awakening

The word "awakening" is used in different ways, but in its core meaning, awakening is the realization that we are the Consciousness that exists beyond the apparent body-mind-ego-person existence.

I clarify that awakening is not about any kinds of realizations, ecstatic experiences, or experiences from other higher dimensions, no matter how impressive they may be. Awakening is a simple state in which, in a flash of consciousness, it is realized that we are the living, silent presence (Consciousness, Being). I also clarify that awakening is not from the ego (the ego does not awaken), but from the ego, meaning we realize that we are not the ego, nor the mind and body.

When awakening occurs, it simultaneously happens that we realize we are the empty, silent space of Consciousness (in which the body and mind appear) and experience a spontaneous disidentification from the mind and body. With awakening, there is a shift in identity—we now perceive ourselves as the silent presence of Consciousness, not as the person identified with the body and mind.

Recognition of Inner Silence and Awakening

It is also important to distinguish awakening from the recognition of inner silence. The recognition of inner silence and awakening are two different things.

The recognition of inner silence happens from within (individual mind-ego) through intentional, careful observation within, whereas awakening happens spontaneously and unexpectedly, without any specific effort on our part.

Recognition means that, through deliberate, careful inner observation, we become aware of the presence of an inner silence that is constantly present within us and remains unchanged regardless of our experiences (psychological or sensory).

Recognition is not accompanied by the realization that we are the inner silence, nor do we realize that this inner silence is the light of Consciousness, which is our true nature (Being, Divine or Spiritual nature).

In contrast to recognition, awakening is something that happens on its own when the time is ripe (through practice) and by God's grace. In awakening, we do not just recognize the silent field within us, but realize that we are that silent field, and this silence is the living presence of Consciousness, which is our true nature. Additionally, with awakening, we do not become an awakened ego, but rather disidentify from the ego and stop perceiving ourselves as the ego-body-mind-person.

For recognizing inner silence, no special ability is required. By having knowledge about inner silence, we can look within with calm, investigative attention and perceive that there is an immobile, silent field, which is constantly present, independent of our psychological state. The recognition of this internal, silent, ever-present, and unchanging empty space is important for our meditation practice, as well as for maintaining contact with the inner silence (self-awareness) from moment to moment, so that we can avoid identifying with thoughts, feelings, and all psychological manifestations of the mind and ego within us.

I emphasize again that recognition is done by us, the person-mind-ego, while awakening dissolves the illusion that we are the person-mind-ego. Nevertheless, the recognition of inner silence is an essential step on the inner path. Recognition is followed by awakening, and awakening leads to self-realization.

Furthermore, I clarify that awakening does not occur through our deliberate act; we cannot awaken whenever we wish by using a specific technique. Awakening happens naturally and spontaneously, by God's grace, at an unexpected moment—a moment we don't expect; it simply happens.

This does not mean that practice, meditation, and other techniques are unnecessary. We prepare the conditions for awakening through continuous, sincere, and systematic practice. The preparation of the mind through consistent practice is essential, not only for awakening to occur but also to have a pure, harmonious, and luminous mind, so that it can remain in conscious contact with our true nature, harmonize with it, and express its will.